Gun Control Under Debate
After the massacre at Virginia Tech, once again the mammoth
issue of gun control has been brought up at full force. Many are highly upset that even after gun
control laws have been enacted that the killer in the massacre was approved for
a gun and purchased it in less than 30 minutes.
Many have speculated that had there been much harsher guidelines in
place, that the sale would not have been completed, and it could have
potentially saved all of the lives that were tragically lost in the
disaster.
The death toll from the massacre has risen to over 30 killed
and more than 20 wounded. This is aside
from the emotional damage that has been caused to the hundreds who are left
grieving in the wake, and those who experienced first hand the trauma of the
event. How can such events really be
avoided? Is it possible to avoid such
tragedy with firmer gun laws?
What about the programs that offer rewards in the form of
video game systems, computers and even cash in exchange for turning guns into
the police? Are these programs
effective? In order to truly control
guns, there has to be consensus around the country where everyone agrees that
it is time for a change and the change occurs quickly, and without
opposition. Gun laws are clearly too
lax, and our country needs to take action to avoid scenes like those in
Virginia from reoccurring.
The chances of something such as this happening are almost
impossible. Neither side of the
political arena can agree with the other side about what appropriate gun
control is, and with many residents of the United States being avid hunters
whom use riffles and shotguns on an almost daily basis, it makes it very
difficult to control all of the actions and movements that occur.
Consider that many weapons used in crimes are illegally
obtained; it makes it very difficult to determine how effective the stiffer gun
laws would really be. With a new
Presidential Primary due to start in the near future, it will seem as if there
will be much heavy debate over how to control the flow of guns into the hands
of those who are dangerous, or potentially dangerous.
Facts remain, that while the election is likely to focus on
this issue, there is still the issue of preserving the Constitutional right to
“bear arms” as long as it is done legally, and those who already have the
weapons currently can potentially be just as dangerous as those looking to
purchase the guns in the future. We are
left with the task of trying to avoid the tragedy as much as possible.
Colorado stepped up to the plate with a swift action
enacting much stiffer gun laws after the Columbine school massacre in which two
teenage boys entered their school donning trench coats and heavy weapons
leaving a wake of blood and fallen students in the path. Colorado decided to avoid future incidents
and enact the tougher laws. It is
suspected that Virginia will follow in this path. The fate of the country rests in the hands of
those elected to the public offices to help determine exactly how far gun
control should go, and how the changes should occur.
Follow @FrontierSecurt
FRONTIER DEFENSE SERVICES, Inc.
Always Committed to Protect You!
Always Committed to Protect You!
* Call us today (714)356-8674
for a no-obligation security consultation!
A message from your friends
Frontier Defense Services, Inc., Staff
www.fdssecurity.com
@frontierdefenseservices
#committedtoprotect #frontierdefenseservices #fdsservices #fdssecurity#frontierdefenseservices.blogspot.com
A message from your friends
Frontier Defense Services, Inc., Staff
www.fdssecurity.com
@frontierdefenseservices
#committedtoprotect #frontierdefenseservices #fdsservices #fdssecurity#frontierdefenseservices.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment